THE DISUSED YETI #22

THE MAKING OF FURY – VIEWER FEEDBACK

You’ve probably worked out by now that this issue is a bit of a Fury from the Deep special!

Originally, we never intended to do a special as such, but with so much material suddenly available on the Fury recon (thanks mainly to Richard Bignell’s documentary), we thought it would be a good idea to try a special issue. If the idea catches on, we might try a few more special issues in the future (an issue on Marco Polo is a definite possibility).

Before we head off ... both of us are looking forward to meeting as many of you as possible at upcoming conventions. Bruce will be at Whovention 2000 in Sydney, while Robert will be at Gallifrey in Los Angeles. Please come up and say “Hi!”

Firstly, thanks to the 400+ people who responded to the 1999 Disused Yeti survey (which was distributed with issue #21). The results are currently being compiled, and should be distributed by the end of February.

Secondly, we’re still receiving a healthy number of orders for issue #1 of Nothing at the End of the Lane. As has been stated before, if you’re thinking about obtaining a copy, but haven’t yet done so, it might be a good idea to consider sending off that cheque or money order! Further details on distribution can be located here:

In the next issue of Disused Yeti, we hope to provide a quick run-down of some of the material we can expect to see in issue #2 of NATEOTL.

The 1999 Disused Yeti survey has provided us with a fascinating array of comments on the missing episodes, recons, audios, and magazine. However, it has also highlighted a couple of niggling problems that people have experienced. Examples include :

If you experience ANY problem similar to those described above, or another problem which you’re uncertain how to resolve, please contact us immediately. If there is a shortcoming in something we do, we would like to rectify it as soon as possible.

Richard Bignell now continues his tale on the creation of the documentary, The Making of Fury from the Deep. In the previous issue, Richard mentioned how the idea of completing the documentary first came to him, as well as some of the preliminary research tasks required to gather material. With the idea of the documentary now gathering momentum, Richard continues the story ...

Things were coming together nicely, so in early March 1999, I e-mailed the JV team and told them about the proposed documentary. Much to my relief, they all loved the idea, so it was now full steam ahead! Michael Palmer suggested that I should aim for a production no more than twenty-five minutes, which would mean that the release could be kept on a single three-hour tape for the UK and Australia. Twenty-five minutes!!!! That would be more than enough, as by this stage, I’d anticipated the total running length being something around the fifteen minute mark.

By this time, the script was virtually finished and I had selected and edited (using Cool Edit 96) the various comments that I wanted to use from the Michael Briant, Margot Hayhoe and Hugh David tapes. So I sat down with a stopwatch and timed all the dialogue. When I finished, I nearly fell of my seat – the running time had come in at forty minutes! The structure of the piece was quite smooth, so I was somewhat loathed to cut things – I e-mailed the JV guys again and explained the dilemma. Rather than cut the documentary, everyone agreed that it would be better to proceed with a longer release and simply use a 4-hour tape for the UK and Australia (the release would be over two tapes in the North America anyway, as NTSC tape lengths are shorter than equivalent PAL tapes).

Inevitably, the question of the 8mm colour studio footage taken at Ealing raised its head. Since Steve Roberts had obtained a low-quality copy of the footage whilst preparing The Missing Years video, we had been working together to track down the original. We had fairly quickly identified the owner as one Tony Cornell (as he had been named as such in an interview with Michealjohn Harris, published in The Frame #7). However, Cornell had retired from the BBC in the late 80’s and, whilst several people remembered him fondly, no-one seemed to know his whereabouts. Several months of detective work followed before I managed to track him down to his home in Lincolnshire. I wrote to Tony (as later did Steve) and, after quite a number of weeks, he wrote back to us. He confessed that he probably did still have his films, but he’d have to dig them out as they were still packed away from when he and his wife moved from London several years previous.

By early May, Tony Cornell had still not found his films, but he had managed to uncover a set of negatives he’d taken at Ealing on the sets of The Tenth Planet, The Web of Fear and, you guessed it – Fury from the Deep. This was a major find. I had location photos that I could use in the documentary, but virtually no studio stills. Tony’s collection of twenty-seven unpublished photographs featuring action on the Ealing sets were a godsend.

The next time we heard from Tony Cornell was on 4 June. Steve emailed me to say that he’d just been sent the original b/w reel of 8mm footage from The Evil of the Daleks, the quality of which he described as “a revelation!” Unfortunately though, the Fury footage had not been found. Tony was gracious enough however to give me permission to use any copy that may exist on video, so at least I would be able to legitimately use the low-quality footage that did exist.

Meanwhile, I’d been busy contacting other people who had worked on the story. John Abineri and Roy Spencer both obliged by sending me their comments, whilst others, such as set designer Peter Kindred and loony helicopter pilot, Mike Smith chose not to reply.

In late July, production was finally put together using the MediaStudio 2.5VE video program. The final files were rendered on the PC and then transferred to the master dubbing tapes. The production was finally at an end. Or so I thought ...

Several things then happened all at once. On a Wednesday evening, about a week after I’d finished the documentary, I received a telephone call.

“Hello, this is Peter Day ...” said the voice on the end of the phone. I’d written to Peter about three months earlier – he’d been the visual effects designer on Fury (as well as playing the seaweed monster). He had been away in France for an elongated holiday and had only just got back home. Apart from a few brief comments he’d made in DWB many years ago, he’d never spoken about his time on the programme.

“Is it too late to contribute to your documentary?” he asked. “What do I tell him?” I thought. Not only was he willing to talk about his time working on Fury, but I had considered doing another documentary at some point on the making of The Evil of the Daleks as I now had access to Cornell’s original behind-the-scenes footage. Peter Day had worked on that too. I thought quickly. “No,” I said, “it’s not too late!” I chatted with Peter for about fifteen minutes and he agreed to send me a tape by the weekend with some recollections, He also said that he’d see if he still had his original effects designs for the seaweed monster (sadly, he didn’t!)

At around the same time, Steve Cambden released his own self-published book entitled The Doctor’s Affect, detailing his involvement with the production of DOCTOR WHO during his teen years (as assistant K9 operator). The book contained two sets of photographic plates, one of which showed two new photographs from Fury – one depicting the Doctor, Jamie and Victoria playing in the foam on location, the other showing the weed creature in the Ealing studio.

Once again, I e-mailed Robert, Richard and Michael. I explained that Peter Day was sending in his comments and if possible, I would like to put a hold on the distribution of the tape for a week or two whilst I included his contribution. Thankfully, the JV team agreed. So whilst I waited for Peter’s tape to arrive, I wrote to Steve Cambden asking the source of the photographs he’d used and if there was any possibility of my using them in the documentary. To be honest, I didn’t expect Steve to agree. His book revealed the fact that he was working on another, for release in 2000 entitled The Doctor’s Effects featuring a host of interviews, design sketches and photographs relating to the show’s visual effects. I thought that if he had any pictures, he’d want to keep them to himself.

I couldn’t have been more wrong. The next day, Steve Cambden telephoned me saying that he’d be delighted to help with the project. I asked if they were the only two photos he had from Fury. The answer was “No!” He had managed to accumulate a collection of forty-one photos from both the location and Ealing shoots! He promised he’d send me the photographs out as soon as he could.

Then on 27 August, another lucky break! Steve Roberts e-mailed to say that Tony Cornell had finally managed to locate his original Fury footage! Not only was the footage clearer than the previous video version, it was also more colourful and the frame edges were intact (the earlier copy had cut some of the picture around the edge). So by delaying the release for a few weeks, I was able to include Peter Day’s comments, use more exclusive photos and utilise a pristine copy of the behind-the-scenes footage!

By this time, I had upgraded my version of MediaStudio from 2.5VE to 5.2. The problem was, it had the effect of completely screwing up all the text captions that I had produced, so they had to be remade from scratch. I also needed to concentrate on improving and equalising the soundtrack, where possible, so several evenings’ work went into the audio side of the production.

The master tapes were then redubbed and copies were also made for all the contributors to the documentary. I’ve had some truly lovely comments back from the likes of Michael Briant, John Abineri, Margot Hayhoe, Tony Cornell and Margaret John, which really has made the project all worthwhile (see below for a sample of the comments).

Since completing the documentary, I have had one regret, however. On Saturday 30 November, BBC2 showed the first part of a new series called THE RIVER, detailing the history of the River Thames. One of the opening shots was taken from a helicopter as it circled around the Red Sands Sea Fort. Now that would have been a lovely sequence to use in both the documentary and the reconstruction!

As mentioned above, Richard Bignell was fortunate to obtain the assistance of many people who worked on the production of Fury. Below is a sample of the feedback received from the production personnel, as well as comments from other viewers:

I can see that you have put in an amazing amount of research, and have spent endless hours of sifting through all the snippets of existing material to produce your epic. Well done – a labour of love if there ever was one!
(TONY CORNELL — Ealing Design Department)

Your documentary was so enjoyable – it was wonderful to see the footage of Hugh David who I worked with on several other serials. I got an e-mail from Michael Briant saying how much he had enjoyed the documentary as well, and now we can keep in touch by the magic of e-mail.
(MARGOT HAYHOE — Assistant Floor Manager)

This is just to tell you how much I enjoyed your documentary on the making of the Fury from the Deep. It is an excellent production, and you made very creative use of the very few moving images available. It was so clever of you to find the excerpts from DANGER MAN, along with the shots of the forts and nice shots of the Margate hotel, which I presume you shot yourself. Listening to Margot Hayhoe, with whom I worked so often back in the Threshold House days, was a real trip down memory lane. It was also wonderful to hear Peter Day, John Abineri, Roy Spencer and Margaret John (the latter I worked with frequently when directing). What a lot of fun we all had working in television in those days. I suspect the time pressures were less and it was still possible to have an original idea and to do something for the first time – well, the first time in DOCTOR WHO anyway. Hugh was a delightful man, a fine director and a very nice person – I remember him with great affection and he would have loved to have seen your excellent documentary about his production. You did him proud. Many congratulations on a splendid production and many thanks for giving me such an enjoyable time watching it.
(MICHAEL BRIANT — Production Assistant)

I’ve just enjoyed myself watching the whole thing. Terrific stuff!! It’s so good and interesting. Thanks so much.
(JOHN ABINERI — Van Lutyens)

Can I take the opportunity of congratulating you on your excellent Making of The Fury from the Deep. It sits alongside More than 30 Years in the TARDIS as the best documentary made on the series – even more laudable considering that it is a “fan” production. Well done!
(PAUL TRICKETT)

I was really bowled over by the superb quality of your documentary. A really amazing achievement, which would put many professional productions to shame. Congratulations on a great piece of work!
(STEPHEN JAMES WALKER)

I am really impressed with how thorough you have been. Coming from a “research” background myself, I can appreciate the quantity of work that has gone into this production. Until recently, I lived in Ramsgate and have always been aware that Fury was filmed at Botany Bay, but you have excelled yourself with the accuracy and depth of your research.
(DEAN ROSE)

The documentary was a splendid piece of work and in many respects was technically indistinguishable from a professional production. This is the sort of thing that would be useful as an appendix to ALL tapes of ALL stories.
(MARTIN WIGGINS)

What can I say ... it was a real treat. Even without the colour footage, the quality and range of the interviewees combined with the location photos made for fabulous viewing. With the colour footage – and with clips from The Slide as well, I find myself kneeling towards you and chanting “We are not worthy!”
(PETER WARE)

The 1999 Disused Yeti survey has already provided a wealth of feedback in regards to what you like, and don’t like, about various projects we’re involved with. Of course, the reconstructions was one of the areas (in fact, the most popular area) in which respondents provided a huge variety of useful and interesting comments. Amongst all the comments were also many queries, as well as a few criticisms (fortunately, most were of a constructive nature). In fact, with all the queries and criticisms to respond to, we have enough potential “Recon Ramblings” material for the next dozen issues!

This issue, we thought we’d take a closer look at the area of story selection – what makes the reconstruction creators decide which stories to complete? (and implicit in this, is what order to complete the recons). A few respondents to the survey were slightly critical of the story choices made by the MPP (Master Plan Productions) team-members. It was felt that MPP should be mainly concentrating on stories yet to be reconstructed (eg The Daleks’ Master Plan), instead of starting with a couple of stories already completed (ie Marco Polo and The Highlanders).

Well, first of all, we agree it would be nice to have every missing DOCTOR WHO story available in some reconstructed format. Like most other fans, we also look forward to the day where the complete run of Hartnell & Troughton stories can be viewed, with recons being available to fill in the gaps.

However, it should be remembered that the MPP recons involve quite a major change in the way reconstructions are produced. The team-members are entering into unexplored territory, especially when it comes to the issue of swapping large quantities of material back and forth all over the globe. Also, one of the team-members (Bruce Robinson) has to come to grips with using software which he has never previously used before (simple as Media Studio may be, time is still required to become reasonably proficient in it). And, of course, there are an assortment of minor production issues that the MPP team-members may not entirely agree upon amongst themselves. Therefore, more time is required to discuss these issues, and in fact, seeing the end product may be the only true indicator of whether something has worked or not.

Because of the uncertainty involved with the MPP project, the team-members felt it would make more sense to start the project with a story that was relatively familiar in terms of creating a recon. Marco Polo was, of course, completed by Bruce Robinson (under the Change of Identity banner) almost three years ago. Although much of the recon will be changing for the MPP version, there is still a significant amount of material that can be taken from the old version. For instance, all the text captions exist, and some thought has already gone into the picture scripting process, ie deciding what photos to use where. Basically, the MPP team-members felt more comfortable in addressing a story where a good proportion of the work was already completed. As a result, more time could be devoted to tackling those trickier issues.

Now consider if we had began with Master Plan. All of a sudden, we’d be required to start everything completely from scratch.

Another deciding factor in story selection is the amount of time needed to collect available material and restore it. In the past we’ve talked about acquiring more photos or better audios, but in many cases, this is only the beginning. After the material is gathered, it must be sorted and decisions made about what can be used “as is”, and what needs to be restored. Deciding which stories to do next also has a lot to do with projecting when any new material might be available and ready for use.

One last thing to keep in mind is variety. While creating these recons we work very closely with the material (some of us might start visualising Resno’s death scene in our sleep). We need a break away from stories that are too similar, or too long. Marco Polo was chosen as a recon that we were familiar with and could improve greatly. As for the choice of Highlanders, we wanted the second story to be something of a “breather” between the 7-episode historical and the Dalek epic (there will probably be another short story inserted between the two Master Plan tapes for this reason).

Overall the selection of certain stories is definitely not an arbitrary one. A lot of thought and planning go into devising a schedule that all the team members are happy with. We also hope the fans appreciate the updated recons as much as the new ones.

STORY GUIDES
[For obvious reasons, we’ve altered the order slightly for this issue ...]

RR : Fury from the Deep

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FURY FROM THE DEEP [JV7]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Since acquiring the excellent The Web of Fear, the JV versions have become my personal favourites. As a result, the latest release from the team, Fury from the Deep, is one reconstruction I have been looking forward to for a very long time.

As usual, to ease us gently back to the 1960’s, we are treated to an interview with one of the show’s stars (Debbie Watling). This is followed by the story synopsis from the Radio Times, as well as the previous week’s trailer of Fury. The story hasn’t even started yet, but I’m hooked! It’s small touches like this that, for me, put JV ahead of the rest.

Throughout, the sound is crisp and the pictures clear, with a healthy mix of publicity shots and enhanced telesnaps. But it’s within the first couple of minutes of episode 1, that we get a hint of things to come. While the Doctor examines the gas pipe on the beach, his stethoscope suddenly appears around his neck. Since receiving Michael Palmer's unique reconstruction of the missing episodes of The Tenth Planet and The Invasion, I have always thought that future releases would benefit from some form of animation in key scenes. I was delighted to see that the use of a similar technique throughout Fury has proved me right. From a working TV monitor, to the foam thrashing about in a tank at the climax of episode 4 (how did they do that?), these specially created moments are carefully slotted in to enhance the story.

However, it doesn’t end there. Before the credits roll, the final scene of each episode moves, either by stock footage, or camera zooms and slides. This compliments the new “animation” technique beautifully.

This story, as we all know, has benefited by the recent findings of censored clips, and the added joy of watching Fury was wondering at what point in the story would they appear. When they finally do arrive, the impact isn't diluted – far from it, it was satisfying to see them in context at long last.

The crowning glory of this release though, has to be the final confrontation scene between the sea creature and our heroes in the control centre. Combined with snappy editing and clever use of amateur film footage, the JV team has created a climax to the story that must be very close to the originally transmitted version.

So what didn’t I like? Well, the answer is nothing, but there were a few things I would like to have seen – a “cross hair” view from the assassin’s gun superimposed on each of the TARDIS crew, followed by a blackout as they were shot in episode 1; some stock helicopter footage to liven up a couple of very dull scenes in episode 5; extra close-ups and zooms in key moments, as seen in The Ice Warriors BBC release. These are small requests and ones that I probably would not have thought of if the reconstruction hadn’t treated us to such video wizardry throughout.

I wouldn’t be surprised that in the future, this release will be seen as turning point in the series, as similar techniques are adopted to keep up with technical advances and our increased expectations. Here’s to the next phase, and I for one cannot wait.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
THE MAKING OF FURY FROM THE DEEP
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It’s always very hard to know where to start when reviewing something that has been created solely for love, and also for a, by definition, limited fan market.

DOCTOR WHO fans have been spoilt over the years with the sheer number of excellent quality videos and books which delve deeply into the history of the show. One of the key aspects of putting together any project is to know what to leave out, and this is, I think, the greatest failing of the documentary looking at the making of Fury from the Deep.

It’s 50 minutes long, but Richard Bignell has managed to cram into that time just about everything known about the story. It’s like watching a video version of one of Andrew Pixley’s Doctor Who Magazine Archives. And this is also its problem – facts and figures about recording dates and times are fine on paper where you can skim past them but know they’re there if ever you wanted to refer back, but on video they’re just dull. Viewers can’t remember them as they are reeled off, and, in the final balance, what is the purpose of including them at all. This complaint goes right through the video – the technical detail is accurate, but does it need to be there?

Another area that I disliked was the use of video captions and spinning/moving photographs. I felt that this just looked amateurish and compared badly with the rest of the tape. The culprits come during the sequences on The Slide, Victor Pemberton’s 1966 radio play which bears uncanny similarities to Fury from the Deep and The Pescatons, Pemberton’s 1976 record drama which, again, treads some of the same ideas.

My final gripe is that the story’s author Victor Pemberton does not appear. Now this may be because he didn’t want to – I’d be very surprised if Richard had not approached him – but the lack of his comments is fairly apparent, and is a shame.

Anyone who has read down this far, will probably have got the idea that I hated this Making-of documentary. Let me put you straight. Despite all the things I’ve mentioned so far, it is engrossing and entertaining, as well as being informative and extremely imaginatively put together and edited. It’s certainly the best video documentary relating to DOCTOR WHO that I have seen, treating its subject with respect and making sure that all the facts are right along the way.

As mentioned, Fury from the Deep has its origins back in 1964 when Pemberton submitted the idea to the DOCTOR WHO office, and also to BBC Radio. DOCTOR WHO turned it down, but Peter Bryant in BBC Radio liked it and commissioned a six-part radio drama called The Slide. The Making-of tape spends quite a bit of time on The Slide, featuring lengthy extracts and detailing just how similar it is to Fury from the Deep.

We then follow the development of the scripts for Fury from the Deep and highlight some of the changes made for transmission. The use of footage of the location Thames Estuary platforms taken from a DANGER MAN episode is inspired and, given that there is a helicopter in that episode as well, really gives the idea of what the location footage in Fury from the Deep might have been like. There are also many brilliant and new photographs illustrating different aspects of the story, from the model TARDIS used on location to Peter Day getting into costume as the eerie Weed Creature. Not to mention the 8mm studio film footage from Ealing which gives us a glimpse in colour of the aforementioned Creature, but also the foam machine, Troughton, and many other aspects of the production ... and the Australian censor footage which shows key moments from the story ... and footage of the locations as they are now ... and the fact that Victoria’s scream at the end was not by Deborah Watling at all, but by ... well you’ll have to get the tape for that one. (I do find it very amusing though that Watling’s reputation as a great screamer was, at least in this story, built on miming to someone else’s screams.)

Not convinced yet? Well what about audio reminiscences and anecdotes from Director Hugh David, Production Assistant Michael Briant, Assistant Floor Manager Margot Hayhoe, Effects designer Peter Day, and actors John Abineri and Roy Spencer?

This is a very well thought out and edited documentary looking at the making of a single story. Yes it has faults, but some of these are down to personal preference, and some are because I perhaps would like the documentary to be of a standard to see a commercial release or transmission. Whichever, Richard is to be applauded for this neat idea and slick execution – a reconstructed documentary on the making of a story which you can also watch and enjoy in reconstructed form.

Just one final question – at the end of the documentary, it is said that the final image of Victoria is her standing alone on the beach as the camera zoomed away. And this effect is achieved with a very neat little effect. However in the reconstruction of Fury from the Deep, the image of the end is not of Victoria on her own, and does not work half as well as Richard’s. Has the reconstruction got it wrong ... I think we should be told.

VICTOR PEMBERTON
Pemberton was indeed contacted at a very early stage of the documentary’s production, but, as with Peter Kindred and Mike Smith, he never responded to the letters that I sent him. Pemberton is known to be somewhat protective of his work, so when word reached me from a very reliable source that he had contacted the BBC about the fact that transcripts of the Fury episodes were freely available on the Internet, I decided that perhaps it would be prudent not to contact him again about the reconstruction and the documentary. I informed the people behind the relevant web site, who immediately responded by taking the Fury scripts off-line for a number of weeks. Sometimes in fandom, it pays to be a little cautious!

FINAL SEQUENCE
The similar sequences in the reconstruction and the documentary were worked on, entirely independently by Michael Palmer and myself and we just happened to use different photographs to achieve the same effect. Michael chose to use one of the telesnaps from the final sequence, whereas I made use of one of the story’s promotional photographs of Troughton, Watling and Hines standing in front of the pipeline.

Interestingly, this sequence took around five hours to produce, as the Doctor, Jamie and the pipeline all had to be photographically painted out of the picture, leaving Victoria all alone. This was then keyed into a still of the TARDIS monitor (from The Mind Robber, if I remember correctly). The finished photograph was something of a masterpiece (even if I do say so myself!) which then ended up being reproduced so small on screen that you couldn’t see all the hard work that had gone into it! Ah well!

The news on The Lion auctions in issue #21 was welcome as I’ve been a bit out of the picture regarding progress on this. It fits however with a rather cryptic call I received at work a month or two back from a TSV reader wanting to use my “Lion’s Tale” article as a link for an auction he was arranging on Ebay. I was preoccupied with other more pressing matters at the time and thought nothing more of it until now.

I was bemused by the closing comment of the article in issue #21 – “All fandom can do now is hope that other film collectors who may possess DOCTOR WHO episodes now realise just how sought-after their prints can be.” – because if Bruce Grenville HAD been made aware how valuable his film print was when Neil Lambess and I first discovered it in his possession, I’m am almost certain that the film would never have found its way back to the BBC. If there are other missing episodes out there, then they may well now go up for auction on the Internet, but I very much doubt that the BBC will be able to buy them – given that they took six months to scrape together the reimbursement for my costs in sending them The Lion in the first place.

This issue, we ask two “long-term” fans to share their thoughts on Fury from the Deep ...

I’d better say at the outset that I’m not that fond of Fury from the Deep. It’s nowhere near as bad as some of the turkeys that came later, but it is not one of my favourite DOCTOR WHO stories.

My basic gripe with it, is that I have a deep dislike of science fiction where people are “taken over” by aliens. I’ve always regarded it as a “cop-out” by writers who couldn’t be bothered to come up with a decent story. A lot of SF in the 1950’s and 60’s (eg, the three QUATERMASS stories, A FOR ANDROMEDA) all followed this pattern. There are several DOCTOR WHO stories I dislike for the same reason.

Fury from the Deep has the same basic plot as every other SF story that Victor Pemberton has ever written (ie, malevolent sea creature that can be destroyed by sound waves). But it’s not truly awful – it does have some redeeming features. Not the least of these being the departure of Victoria from the series. I always found Victoria a very annoying character, nearly as irritating as Susan (but that’s another story).

It’s always amazed me that it takes the Doctor so long to work out how to destroy the weed creature. It’s obvious from the beginning of episode two that the thing doesn’t like Victoria’s screams (I wasn’t that fond of them myself) but it takes nearly five more episodes before the Doctor realises the answer.

Sadly, I have very few memories of this story, as it came at a time when my mother was ill in hospital, and Saturday afternoons were spent visiting her. Because the hospital was some distance from home, I missed quite a few DOCTOR WHO episodes at the time, including episodes 1, 3 and 5 of Fury. As a result, the story did not make a great impact on me. I remember it as yet another DOCTOR WHO story with lots and lots of foam (previously used in The Web of Fear). I had seen how the foam was produced some months previously on TOMORROW’S WORLD. The only other memory I have is the very sad ending when Victoria decided to stay on Earth – her leaving seemed very sudden and therefore all the more poignant. There was a final shot of her waving from the beach as the camera panned away from her and into the sky, as if viewed from the departing TARDIS. Other than that, alas, I remember very little other than lots of screaming, lots of noise and all that foam!

Thanks to the following for help with this issue : Rick Brindell, David Butler, David Howe, Dominic Jackson, John King, and Lee Moone. And a special thank you to Richard Bignell – we couldn’t have done this issue without you, Richard!

The DOCTOR WHO reconstructions are fan-produced endeavours completed without the consent of BBC Worldwide, BBC Television, or any holders of the DOCTOR WHO licence. No infringement on any such copyright holder is intended nor are the tapes produced for any sort of monetary compensation. Tapes are distributed through the worldwide DOCTOR WHO fan network. Support the BBC releases!

All material published in this newsletter is copyright the Disused Yeti newsletter. Please do not reprint any of the contents in another publication (whether electronic or print) without obtaining the prior permission from the editors.

The newsletter is available in three formats – plain text, Word 6, and HTML. In addition, there is also an “announcement” mailing list which simply announces the release of a new issue, and provides details on how the issue can be downloaded. Please send an E-mail to Bruce if you wish to be added to any of these lists (or wish to have your details altered or removed). The back-issues (in text, Word and HTML format) can be located at the following web-site:

Episode	TX	TI	DU	VA	CP	AA
Episode 1	16 Mar 68	17.15	24’54”	8.2	46	55
Episode 2	23 Mar 68	17.16	23’08”	7.9	40	55
Episode 3	30 Mar 68	17.16	20’29”	7.7	47	56
Episode 4	06 Apr 68	17.15	24’17”	6.6	62	56
Episode 5	13 Apr 68	17.16	23’40”	5.9	73	56
Episode 6	20 Apr 68	17.15	24’24”	6.9	42	57

Episode	DR	FT	RA	CUTS
Episode 1	22 Jan 69	938	G	no cuts
Episode 2	22 Jan 69	870	G	cut A
Episode 3	22 Jan 69	767	G	no cuts
Episode 4	22 Jan 69	911	G	cuts B, C
Episode 5	22 Jan 69	887	G	cuts D, E
Episode 6	22 Jan 69	916	G	no cuts